•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences

SC constitution bench to hear Aadhaar privacy petitions on October 14

The Supreme Court on Thursday said a constitution bench will hear on 14 October a batch of applications, including one by the central government seeking “clarification/modification” of its 11 August order to permit the use of Aadhaar card for availing benefits under social welfare schemes including as an identity proof.

The apex court in a brief notice issued on Thursday evening said the constitution bench will take up the petitions challenging the validity of the Aadhaar card scheme on the grounds that it violated the right to privacy.

The notice issued by the apex court said: “Take notice that the matter above mentioned (Justice KS Puttaswamy (retd) and others) will be listed on 14.10.2015 at 2 p.m. before the constitution bench.”

Earlier in the day, the central government urged the apex court to constitute a constitution bench to hear its plea to allow the use of Aadhaar card for the disbursal of benefits under various social welfare schemes and also in banking and financial transactions.

As Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi asked the bench headed by Chief Justice HL Dattu to constitute a larger bench to hear their plea for “clarification/modification” of the 11 August order, the court said it was “very difficult” to constitute a larger bench for an early hearing.

Chief Justice Dattu said it was difficult to spare nine judges to hear the plea as it would adversely affect the working of other courts.

He also said he would consider the plea by Friday evening.

The Attorney General mentioned the matter after the bench of Justice J Chelameswar, Justice SA Bobde and Justice C Nagappan on Wednesday referred a batch of applications, by the government and other agencies, seeking use of Aadhaar card on a voluntary basis, to a larger bench as it refused to relax its 11 August interim order.

The apex court had restricted the use of Aadhaar card for distribution of foodgrain under PDS, supply of kerosene oil and LPG only.

By its 11 August order, the court referred to a larger bench the question whether right to privacy was a fundamental right -- an issue rooted in the conflicting judgments of the apex court.

The order referring the matter to a larger bench had come on a batch of petitions including by the former judge of Karnataka high court Justice KS Puttaswamy, who contended that the biometric data and iris scan that was being collected for the issuance of Aadhaar card violated the fundamental right to privacy of the citizens as personal data was not protected, and was vulnerable to exposure and misuse.

The apex court by its 1954 judgment by a bench of eight judges and later in 1964 by a bench of six judges had held that the right to privacy was not a fundamental right but from 1975 onwards, the smaller two or three judges’ bench elevated the right to privacy as a fundamental right.

Click to show 1 comment
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.