Luthra & Luthra partner Santanu Mukherjee, who is head of international trade and policy advisory at the firm and had joined less than a year ago, has announced he’d leave Luthra to apparently go independent.
Mukherjee had joined Luthra in January 2016 from US software giant Qualcomm, where he was a senior attorney in IPR and competition for India and South Asia.
In a goodbye email to the firm, he wrote that he would be “flying solo” from the beginning of 2017 after leaving Luthra by the end of this month.
We have reached out to him and Luthra’s respective managing and senior partners, Rajiv Luthra and Mohit Saraf, for comment via email earlier today.
Mukherjee is a 1997 LLB graduate from South Calcutta Law College of Calcutta University, and holds a 2001 masters in WTO Law & Practice from the World Trade Institute in Bern, Switzerland.
He had also spent several years working on global trade and IP Policy research at the elite Max Planck Institute for IP and competition law in Munich, Germany, and on policy research and advocacy at the South Centre Secretariat in Geneva.
As a Chevening Scholar he was also a visiting lawyer at Littleton Chambers at the Inner Temple in London.
Mukherjee is at least the third partner to leave Luthra this year, following Rajesh Chavda - who left in-house only 18 months after joining from Herbert Smith Freehills, senior partner Vijaya Rao in Mumbai who went part-time, and corporate partner Aparna Mittal who departed for rival AZB & Partners.
Luthra has made several lateral partner hires in that time: Durga Bose Gandham from Tatva Legal in Hyderabad, Apurva Jayant from Samvad Partners in Mumbai, as Luthra’s former partner Pradyuman Dubey returned in litigation.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
1. Inability to put down the mad dogs: luthra has a culture of allowing certain people to project to the world that they are god's gift to mankind. These people then hijack the agenda of the firm, and the more able minded people get sidelined. The firm plays along so long as these people rake in money.
2. Overemphasis on "connected" hiring: first floor speaks for itself, the sheer conflict of interest in certain cases is mind blowing.
3. Predatory partners: some partners believe in the philosophy of "eat your young ones".
4. hiring scam: There is a certain college (and certain type of people from that college) that find disproportionate representation. We all know about it and wink at it, but this needs to be fixed.
He was accompanied by another "partner" who seemed extremely inexperienced to be a partner. He had no idea of the strutures followed in an M&A transactions and was a bit lost in all the documentation. I later learnt that he projects himself as a regulatory expert too!
Convinced that I will not be hiring this firm.
Is it actually true, or you are just faffing coz you have an axe to grind with one of the S.A.?
Its a cycle. Which post bonus will start again. Upward and onward. Also moves within a year are fairly common in the international legal market whose entry Indian lawyers are waiting for.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first