Read 16 comments as:
Filter By
Does it look better to do so? The placecom in my college sent a model CV saying it is optional.

A few Indian law firm partners are doing so on Twitter and LinkedIn.
Don't. PPL don't understand what these pronouns mean and just add because it looks cool and gives an impression of bieng "woke".

Real story- Recently partners of a tier 1 firm started using these in their LinkedIn profiles and when asked why...the answer was "oh everyone's doing it now". We laughed so much.

Putting a prefix / suffix next to your name does not get you work or recognition. Gender identify/ preferences shouted out loud doesnt do jack. Your skill, expertise and hardwork gets you results.

Avoid.
Don’t ask the same question again and again. It truly is optional. No one is going to have the time to assume shit about you. Because they really only care about whether you can do the job they want
A 4-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
A 9-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
Only if you're applying at Centre for Law & Policy Research otherwise, no.
That's a good point actually - as with any CV / covering letter question, one size doesn't fit all.

Do research BEFORE you apply to an organisation. Find out about the decision makers and powers that be, whether they're active on social media, etc. If some of them specify pronouns or the organisation is dealing with gender justice issues or your LLM is going to be focusing on those issues in particular, or the organisation / LLM looks generally more a bit more young and 'hip', for instance, then it's certainly an option for you to do so too (though unlikely to be obligatory yet).

Most corporate jobs won't care, however, and nearly none will hold it against you if you don't (but also only a few might hold it against you).

In short, if you're thinking of putting he/him purely for virtue signalling / CV point purposes, don't. If you believe in what it stands for, then stand by it and use it.
A 34-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
To be very honest, if you have a generic name, it doesn't matter. But if you have a name through which your gender cannot be determined, it saves a lot of awkward email salutations if you just mention your pronouns. I personally prefer pronouns which will help me write emails faster without wasting time guessing the other person's gender. Wokeness blablabla aside, it has a practical utility.
Very true for Punjabi names, which are often unisex, e.g. Manjeet, Mandeep, Gurjeet etc.
this has been asked so many times its frustrating to look at random people writing this everywhere from insta handles to linkedin, maybe even exam papers!
don't do it, just don't, nobody cares really
maybe it makes you look really woke and helps you get more "activist" friends, but it really does NOT fit in
What are you saying? Top lawyers who are alumni of NLSIU and NALSAR use it on LinkedIn. I'm taking of corp lawyers, not woke activists as you claim
To be honest, it does seem a little strange why people should get so upset by it... Can understand that it might look annoying or like virtue signalling if you're not used to it, but end of the day, it's a slightly nice and easy thing to do to make a few people feel a bit safer, that is completely optional.

Is the fear that it could catch on and nearly everyone will start doing it, and there'll be cultural pressure on people who don't do it, who will be perceived as uncool? Or does specifying pronouns 'trigger' some people for some reason?
A lot of people may come to the conclusion that you are an activist based on this and avoid you.

maybe some people will like to see this if they are woke themselves.

But really avoid it, not worth the trouble. It can be a basis for rejection and not much likely to help.
Please avoid such things. No brownie points are there to be scored by using them