Read 20 comments as:
Filter By
I am seeing this repeatedly on Bar & Bench, the latest example being today:

https://www.barandbench.com/news/breaking-consider-postponing-up-elections-allahabad-high-court-election-commission-pm-modi

Aren't High Courts supposed to publish judgements in English? Article 348(2) of the Constitution says:

The Governor of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorise the use of the Hindi language, or any other language used for any official purposes of the State, in proceedings in the High Court having its principal seat in that State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to any judgment, decree or order passed or made by such High Court

Very clearly, judgements cannot be in regional languages, only proceedings can be.

Also, do the Madras/Bombay/Calcutta/Karnataka/Andhra/Punjab/Odisha/Kerala/Gujarat High Courts publish judgments in Tamil/Marathi/Bengali/Kannada/Telugu/Punjabi/Odiya/Malayalam/Gujarati ? Or it is just a Hindi thing?
iirc
If governor deems fit and legislature passes a legislature for the same, high court can deliver in any language other than English.
I can send Madras HC's judgments in Tamil.

I really don't understand why people have an issue with local languages being embraced. If you are not comfortable in English, might as well use your mother tongue than commit blunders in English.
An HC judge after reaching that height and still not being 'comfortable with English' after having used that language to get all their legal education in, isn't really a valid excuse. Further, the use of these languages also create access barriers. There should be a mandatory translation of these judgements alongside in that case.
High Courts CANNOT give a judgement in Hindi without an English translation. The SC has rebuked Justice Yadav of the Allahabad HC for this (this is the same dude who gave the above judgement, he previously gave a judgement saying cow should be the national animal).
Unconstitutional you say? Bhai maybe read the Constitution once in a while. Start from Article 343 and you will get your answer. Official language of India is Hindi and use of English needs extension of legislature from time to time.
I think interpretation of statues is not your strong point, but lex specialis derogat legi generali. In a conflict between arts. 343 and 348(1), art. 348(1) takes precedence over art. 343, which is why High Courts and the Supreme Court give judgments in English (and Acts and Bills are in English as well).

There is thus a constitutional mandate for High Courts to conduct proceedings (and pronounce judgments) in English, read with s. 7 of the Official Languages Act, 1963. An English translation has to follow the Hindi judgment, if such is the case when the Governor has allowed.
Promoting Hindi is a constitutional mandate. Read the relevant articles
Given that judges are cycled around across the states, its absolutely impossible for say a judge from Kerala working in Jharkhand to give a judgement in Malayalam in the Jharkhand HC. But the opposite happens because Hindi is apparently a "national language". Pretty sure we'll see a gradual erosion of regional languages, regional customs eventually, and turn our beautiful and diverse nation into one big Uttar Pradesh.