In an "article" shared on a Tier 1 law firm's LinkedIn page, which is "co-written" by an Associate and a partner, who does the actual writing, and what percentage of effort is put in by the partner?
Curious to see how things work in other firms. In my sad experience, articles written entirely by A1s were published in the name of the partner. Doubt the partner even read the article properly forget actually writing anything. It's happened so many times that anytime I see a co-written article or an article in the sole name of the partner, I assume it's been written entirely by the Associate or someone not credited at all. Although in some cases I've seen the partner's limited input of discussing the issue before the Associate writes.
NLU grads directly get absorbed into Illuminati. In fact, they are interning for Illuminati while attending 5 years of law school, their "internships" are to observe the society in through all walks of life, before, they are sent to Syria, Iran, Afghanistan and other radical I$lamic countries. They will eventually take-over the planet, Nostradamus had predicted this 6969 years ago.
no associate can write so correctly and knowledgeably that a partner will tag his name along i would say the partner has atleast some role in the points and setting
Usually: Partner suggests that associate write something. Associate comes up with the 1st draft. Partner gives inputs. Associate revises. Partner sends it to places for publication.
This is fine IMO because Associate gets access to publisher she otherwise didn't have. Partner gets to stay relevant with thoughts on recent developments.
It's a very problematic/toxic practice if Associate isn't credited as co-author.
The ghost writers have existed since ancient times. Who wrote 'Ratnavali'? Or, 'Priyadarshika'? Or, for that matter, 'Nagananda'? It was Bhasa who, actually, acted as the ghost writer for Harshavardhana of Kanauj.
Simply, a misuse of power and domination by EPs who don't any other shit, other than their shitty SPAs.
I did an article. My partner got it published in ET, with him as the sole author. He told me, we will change the wordings and get it published at couple of other places too, with my name as 'co-author' :( BKL
They're straight hired as associate partners,and promoted to the partner role in a couple of years.
i would say the partner has atleast some role in the points and setting
This is fine IMO because Associate gets access to publisher she otherwise didn't have. Partner gets to stay relevant with thoughts on recent developments.
It's a very problematic/toxic practice if Associate isn't credited as co-author.
Simply, a misuse of power and domination by EPs who don't any other shit, other than their shitty SPAs.