Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences

Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

CJI Thakur: Indian arbitration has to seriously pick up its game

The new Chief Justice of India (CJI) TS Thakur on Friday said for arbitration to succeed in India, all those involved in the process, be it the arbitrator or the lawyers, would have to act professionally.

Pointing out that the arbitration overseas was highly professional, he said that it was this lack of professional approach that was coming in the way of arbitration not flourishing in India.

“If you want to flourish in India, you have to be professionally competent” and “a matter (under arbitration) must finish once it has started otherwise it becomes oppressive both to the parties to arbitration and the arbitrator,” he said in his inaugural address at the two-day international conference ‘Arbitration in the era of globalisation’ organised by the Indian Council of Arbitration and business chamber FICCI

He said that while in India, an arbitrator sits for two hours, in London, they sit for eight hours with half an hour break.

Similarly, Chief Justice Thakur said that if litigant was paying a lawyer, then the lawyer could not seek adjournment to suit his schedule.

Calling for a change in the legal format of arbitration, he said that there were things in law that need a relook but expressed satisfaction that the government was alive to it and was making changes, citing the instance of it bringing amendments even to the ordinance relating to the Arbitration Act.

Saying that there was no conflict between the judiciary and arbitration, he assured that judiciary from top to bottom would support its growth as it would take away that much burden of the judiciary.

However, he urged the judiciary to be sensitive and restrained in interfering with arbitration awards.

“Judiciary also needs to be sensitive. You need to (show) restraint in interfering in the arbitration awards. In any arbitration, one has to lose, both (the parties to arbitration) cannot walk out happily,” he said.

However, he stressed need for “a proper format that may not provide for an open-ended challenge to the arbitration award”.

Noting that arbitration was prevalent even in ancient India and merchants took recourse to it for settling commercial disputes, former apex court judge SS Nijjar said that effort needs to be made for India to become an “arbitration-friendly nation”.

“We have to grow as an arbitration-friendly nation” and it can happen only if we have a system of giving finality to arbitration awards coupled with speedy arbitration and no multitude of litigations,” he said.

FICCI president Jyotsna Suri also spoke on the occasion.

Click to show 1 comment
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
Like +4 Object -0 Guest 12 Dec 15, 21:17
Thanks for reporting - good to hear a CJI pointing out how short arbitration hearings in India are, merely to suit a few vested interests and not business needs.
Reply Report to LI

Latest comments