Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Other
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Deals
Courts
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences


Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

SH Kapadia, end of an era: India’s greatest ever CJI or missed opportunity? How will you remember the legacy?

Kapadia: A job well doneKapadia: A job well done After he retires as Chief Justice of India (CJI) today, Sarosh Homi Kapadia will leave a legacy that will be both defined and shrouded by his circumstances.

For example, Kapadia’s immediate predecessor K. G. Balakrishnan spent more than three years in the CJI chair and attracted significant controversy, criticism and a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe. Kapadia, by contrast, is unimpeachable by nearly all accounts.

“The main thing (Kapadia) had was that at a time when things were really getting bad, there was one man whose integrity could not be doubted at all,” commented one senior counsel.

Kapadia’s integrity is almost as legendary as his personal history that seems written for an Indian audience.

Born into a poor Parsi family just after India’s independence, he later worked as a peon-level employee in Bombay, learned to love the law, lunched on roasted channa at Mumbai’s Flora Fountain near the Bombay high court, and rose and rose through inhumanly hard work to became arguably one of India’s most influential men of the last two years – a story that was told beautifully by Forbes last month.

Post-retirement, Kapadia apparently doesn’t plan to be appointed into any post by the government as several other ex-apex court judges have been, according to Supreme Court lawyers. Instead, he is generally believed to want to return to Mumbai and work as an arbitrator - a highly lucrative career option for retired judges, particularly for those with his skill sets, and a fitting coda to his remarkable story.

Judicial discretion

The timing of Kapadia’s ascent was nearly perfect, coinciding with India’s post-liberalization transition from a system where discretion and the license raj ruled supreme to a more Western, rules-based economy. In such a system the rule of law rose beyond a jurisprudential concept to become a practical driver of economic growth, and the Supreme Court and its judges would be its captains.

In cases such as the 2G cases, the Vodafone case and the Sahara case, the Kapadia-era Supreme Court has arguably laid down the law for both the government and India Inc - no matter what the stakes, the parties in question or their market capitalization, no matter what spectres or threats of future chaos are raised, the Supreme Court will enforce the rule of law at all costs.

Last Saturday Kapadia confirmed as much at a conference on economic growth and the corporate environment alongside his successor, chief justice designate Altamas Kabir, and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Kapadia said that only the rule of law could ensure a “minimum standard of fairness” as the “single largest” stimulant factor to economic growth rather than an impediment, according to The Hindu.

Kapadia also applauded the Government’s announcement the previous day to liberalize foreign direct investment (FDI) in supermarkets and the aviation sector economic reforms, which could avert “doomsday” by encouraging investment and fostering jobs growth, according to the Mail Today.

This was a rare public statement outside of court that went beyond Kapadia’s thoughts about judgeship by the famously media shy CJI (though media shyness risks misrepresenting his categorical self-imposed ban on being interviewed by media; his office did not respond to emails seeking comments.

But hints of the new Supreme Court philosophy were also obvious in Kapadia’s court.

The 6 September 2012 decision of the five-judge constitution bench headed by Kapadia on arbitration law, overruled the so-called Bhatia International case that had long spooked foreign investors and companies from settling disputes via arbitration with Indian companies, since Indian courts would stall arbitrations with their intervention.

And in his Vodafone income tax judgment, Kapadia stated his philosophy even more clearly: “FDI flows towards location with a strong governance infrastructure which includes enactment of laws and how well the legal system works. Certainty is integral to rule of law. Certainty and stability form the basic foundation of any fiscal system.”

Zodiac

That case was another example of how Kapadia’s star was perfectly aligned not just in terms of timing but also his interests: Kapadia’s tax law expertise is generally acknowledged as having no equals in the Indian bench.

At stake in the Vodafone case, notwithstanding later retrospective government legislation seeking to undo the judgment, were billions of dollars lost to either a foreign company or the government coffers, and it was quickly touted as one of India’s most important foreign investment-related disputes of recent years. But for many by-now jaded citizens, it would have been hard not to be suspicious of any human sitting judgment in such a case.

One lawyer, M. L. Sharma, attempted to draw a tenuous link between Kapadia and his son, who joined Ernst & Young one year after a different department of the firm had worked on the Vodafone-Hutchison deal. Sharma was fined Rs 50,000 by two other Supreme Court justices for the “frivolous” claim, though he tried for a second bite at proving potential Kapadia bias in another case because Kapadia’s son-in-law worked with a Tata group company.

A few other judges could have wavered under such attacks, however frivolous. Not so Kapadia.

Judicially, he may be remembered for several other tax judgments and asides from just economics, Kapadia also passed down the judgment upholding the constitutional validity of the revolutionary Right to Education Act. Less favourably, perhaps, the constitution bench hearing into regulating media reporting of court cases attracted flak not just from journalists but also from several advocates.

The boss

That said, judging the law is only half the job of a Chief Justice of India, who is nominally entrusted with managing India’s sprawling court system that comes loaded with more than 3 crores pending cases and the baggage of institutional and historical inefficiencies.

According to the pendency statistics, Kapadia did not book a success. When he took office in April 2010 a total of 55,018 were pending in the Supreme Court. This increased by nearly 16% until August 2012, when 63,749 cases are pending, of which 42,583 have been on the books for more than one year. The numbers in the lower courts too, which in fairness are not directly under Kapadia’s control, continued increasing.

One senior counsel claimed that it would be unfair to blame the outgoing CJI for this, however. “It really can’t be solved by any chief justice,” he said, adding that it is an inherent flaw in the system where any case can reach the apex court via special leave petitions (SLP) and there are no set hearing dates. And the lower courts are practically under the day-to-day supervision of the high courts.

“(Kapadia) can put the fear of god into people and things like that, but the country’s so big and there are so many courts, how much can the Chief Justice of India really do?” asked the advocate.

Kapadia certainly tried to impose discipline in his own backyard, such as by restricting advocates trying to leapfrog cases out of their scheduled order in his own court.

Cash register

Corruption in the Supreme Court registry has decreased significantly in Kapadia’s tenure, according to several advocates. “Previously somebody could try and have a matter fixed before a particular bench,” said one, or files could become lost or matters could get delayed.

Kapadia fixed this through sheer force of personality and hard work, poring over the list of the next day’s hearings with a fine tooth comb. “People in the registry were in terror of him,” recounted one advocate about how the chief managed to stem the registry’s indiscretions.

But in the lower court registries, it is still business as usual and a larger problem than it ever was at the apex court, claimed several lawyers.

The flipside of the chief’s campaign was a letter sent to Kapadia in June by the Supreme Court Advocates On Record (AOR) Association (SCAORA), complaining that the registry now suffered from “bottlenecks created by one sided decisions of the registry”. The AORs blamed this on a “communication gap” between the bench and the bar at an “institutional level”.

In a telling anecdote about Kapadia’s top-down management style, the SCAORA head’s letter noted that “members have observed with dismay and due respect that Your Lordship did not stay even for a minute for tea after finishing of the function or Farewell Parties for retiring Judges. It is respectfully suggested the open interaction on such occasions where there can be free interaction of ideas in the interest of the institution need not and ought not to be avoided”.

A similar communication gap is also said to have widened within the bench itself, according to several advocates, with the collegium of senior-most judges having failed to agree on any new appointments to the Supreme Court bench since May. With the recent retirement of Justice Deepak Verma, the apex court headcount would drop to 25 after Kapadia’s retirement – six below the sanctioned strength of 31, and four fewer than at the beginning of 2011.

Tenacious tenure

At 871 days or two years and just over four months, Kapadia has enjoyed one of the longest tenures in recent history as India’s judicial chief – in 27 years only three have served for longer.

However, due to the intricacies of the judicial appointment and retirement process, Kapadia’s successors Kabir and Justice P Sathasivam are scheduled to head the country’s judiciary for only around nine months each, which will barely be enough time to make a dent.

“The fact of the matter is that (Kapadia) had the longest tenure but I don’t think he has done anything significant to use that tenure to make (lasting changes),” said one Supreme Court advocate, adding that a lot would depend on the personality of the next CJIs and whether they can continue the micromanagement of the registry as Kapadia had done.

Kapadia should have worked on computerizing the apex court by creating a full e-court, as the Delhi high court has started doing, said the advocate, although another lawyer speculated that this would take at least a decade because the older generation of judges would never be comfortable with using information technology in the courtroom. Kabir may yet end up proving both of them wrong.

The problem of Supreme Court judges’ short terms, is of course institutional, and something that might only be fixed by raising the retirement age, though that carries with it the risk that someone less administratively gifted than Kapadia could run the place into a quagmire over a longer time.

Without doubt, Kapadia enjoys huge respect and senior lawyers and former colleagues have been quick to heap praise on him in a large number of recent published profiles.

But will he be remembered in the pantheon of India’s greatest CJIs? “No way near,” said one senior counsel, citing M. N. Venkatachaliah as a recent example of an all-round truly great CJI.

However, very few would disagree that Kapadia was the right man with the right job, who, crucially, was there at the right time.

Further reading on and around Kapadia:

LI and Mint, together every fortnightLI and Mint, together every fortnight

A shorter version of this article appeared in today’s Mint. Legally India has an exclusive content partnership with Mint, which will feature the latest legal news and analysis every fortnight on Fridays in its print and web editions.

Click to show 16 comments
at your own risk
(alt+shift+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
1
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 PK 28 Sep 12, 15:48
While it is great that the media supported Justice Kapadia in his anti-corruption crusade, it is sad that the media is ignoring the controversy related to Althmas Kabir's son.

andamanchronicle.com/content/view/4444/27/
Reply Report to LI
1.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 Adv. Jerry 30 Sep 12, 21:44
This news should not be ignored. It should be highlighted, if not,it is implied that the Press is biased in its reporting.
Reply Report to LI
2
Show?
Like +2 Object -0 Objective 28 Sep 12, 16:03
The Article seems to be lopsided. Neither are the judgments delivered by Kapadia J. of a very high scholarly standard and neither was his administration. His recommendation of J. Swatanter Kumar during the fag end of his tenure further raises doubts about the impeccable integrity. Sure, money was not involved, but even bestowing favours of any particular person would in my opinion be a blot on integrity! That said, he was better than the previous CJ!
Reply Report to LI
2.1
Show?
Like +3 Object -0 RS 29 Sep 12, 11:34
To add to the above, one of the biggest controversies surrounding J. Kapadia, which you won't find in media reports, but something which is an admitted position in the Bombay and Delhi Bar. On account of his personal prejudices / equations / rivalry with Justice A.P. Shah since their Bombay High Court days, Justice A.P. Shah was not elevated to the SC only on J. Kapadia's insistence (as a member of the SC collegium). It is nearly unanimous opinion amongst the Bar and Bench that Justice A.P. Shah thoroughly merited a seat on the SC. No other Judge of his calibre has remained Chief Justice of 2 High Courts for 6 years (2005 - 2008 Mad HC & 2008 - 2010 Delhi HC) without being elevated! At the most, it takes 2 years as CJ of a HC, before one is elevated. And there is no one who doubts Justice A.P. Shah's legal acumen.
See:
www.indianexpress.com/news/supreme-but-not-superior/583098/
www.indianexpress.com/news/with-sense-of-hurt-chief-justice-a-p-shah-author-of-landmark-rulings-retires-from-hc/578909/
www.ndtv.com/article/india/justice-a-p-shah-retires-hurt-16247

In fact the first link here, is a article written by the son of a sitting HC judge. So you know, this is a sentiment shared by even the Bench.
Reply Report to LI
3
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 Adv. Jerry 28 Sep 12, 18:21
Gratifying news to read about CJI S. Homi Kapadia. Truly he has started from the lowest rung and reached the top most rung. He will be etched in the memory for his integrity.
Reply Report to LI
4
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Anon 28 Sep 12, 19:33
I am bit confused--are we saying he was the greatest CJI for his administrative qualities or for his judicial pronouncements. If it is his judicial pronouncements, then it surely doesn't surpass judgments of BK Mukherjea, SR Das, HR Khanna or Krishna Iyer--both in law and the effect it has had on the country's jurisprudence.
Reply Report to LI
4.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Vakeel 30 Sep 12, 13:52
Doubt, Krishna Iyer deserves to be the part of the list. He had too many personal biases which was evident in his judgements.
Reply Report to LI
5
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Lawyer 28 Sep 12, 20:20
He didn't do anything regarding the transfer of newly appointed judges in the High Court. Judges of trial courts cannot be given home stationing then why the exceptions for the High Court judges! Higher courts involve higher integrity, which wasn't taken care of by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kapadia.
Reply Report to LI
6
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 g s bhatia 28 Sep 12, 20:56
In fact Justice Kapadia had done more judicial work sitting in court and not tried to be more popular in seminars as his predecessor done.
Reply Report to LI
7
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Kishen 29 Sep 12, 05:02
Justice Kapadia is very much an inspiring gentleman and jurist. His personality and intellect is remniscent of the old-school and he is neither flashy nor arrogant. It is a tribute to the Parsi community that they continueto produce such talented lawyers.

Pity same thing cannot be said for Altamas Kabir.
Reply Report to LI
7.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Dahi Balla and Asociates 29 Sep 12, 13:24
haaaaw kian? how come you didnt censor this comment?
Reply Report to LI
8
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 jabir hasan 29 Sep 12, 15:27
I think author has given a wrong title to his writing. Greatest ever CJI. NO way Mr. Author.
Reply Report to LI
9
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Chiefs Court 29 Sep 12, 20:05
Well, I will remember him as a good, honest, hard-working chief justice who performed his judicial duty to the best of his abilities. His integrity and self-discipline is also something to be recognised. The qustion of 'mised opportunity' does not arise.
Reply Report to LI
10
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Anoop Prakash 29 Sep 12, 20:57
He has been a champion of arrogance. No fresher can appreciate his judicial veto on bar exam. Since 2010, no progress in that case and advocates languishing from BCI's incompetence.
Reply Report to LI
11
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Anon 29 Sep 12, 21:40
The title of this piece is indeed unfortunate. Perhaps it stems from Gen Y's perception of squeaky clean honesty and integrity as being "uncool" or "out of fashion". At a time when Coalgate and 2G gate have brought international shame to India, surely a man whose honesty is beyond all reproach should not be pilloried. His seminal judgements - especially in my opinion the arbitration judgement - hopefully heralds the beginning of an era when judges will shun the proclivity to play God and go back to good old textual interpretation, with a solid dose of common sense. Greatest CJI or not I do not know. But this I do know that Justice Kapadia is the best thing to have happened to our country in the last decade and a half.
Reply Report to LI
12
Show?
Like +3 Object -0 Pixar 29 Sep 12, 21:42
Altamas Kabir may have a great legal brain but is well known to have an inner circle of friends in the SC and HCs around the country : expect some unusual and unexpected promotions to the SC (from the HCs) in times to come. That is where Justice Kapadia's greatness lies. No one could even in his dreams point a finger at him.
Reply Report to LI


Latest comments