Constitutional law expert and senior counsel KK Venugopal has represented the Travancore royal family in the Supreme Court, submitting that they did not intend to claim possession over the contents of the “public temple” that may be worth up to $22bn.
Venugopal submitted on behalf of the royal heirs that “no part of the wealth belongs to any person except the deity, Lord Padmanabhaswamy”, according to the Times of India.
The apex court bench of Justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik expressed relief, according to the paper, following intense debate and fears of claims and counter-claims over the riches that were discovered last week.
The temple was opened following a writ petition in the Kerala High Court by lawyer Sundara Rajan, who said the state should take over the temple because the royal family was incapable of protecting the riches. Rajan was represented by counsel Anand Padmanaban.
The Supreme Court bench said yesterday: “Valuation of articles is secondary, more important is preservation, safety and security.”
The central government intends to create a security cordon of up to 500m around the temple, consisting of 200 police and commando forces, which is to be introduced at a cost of Rs 30 crore ($6.8m) per year according to a media report.
Share your views below on where you think the treasure should go.
Photo by mykl roventine
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
It is the temple property.
Just like we don't take away old precious marble off the Taj for it's monetary value.
Why remove the donations to the deity from the temple?
End of debate.
Like you cannot ask Vatican to sell its historical treasures (currently in display and in storage in Swiss Banks) you should not expect these treasures to be handed over to the state.
The petitioners case that "the state should take over" is also baseless as the "state" has been proven to be fully capable of misgovernance, mismanagement and corruption (refer to various Devaswom board cases and general trends including 2G/CWG scams and such).
Apart from that, the state should have no role in managing any Trust's property or any private person's property for that matter.
Last checked, India was not a totaliarian state where everything belongs to the government.
I rest my case !
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first