The Delhi High Court is slated to welcome Delhi Tis Hazari district judge Sunita Gupta and Delhi HC registrar general VP Vaish as additional judges after at least four senior advocates and one advocate are due to take seat at the bench.
Gupta and Vaish will be the sixth and seventh to take up the mantle, an authoritative source close to the process told Legally India, while the name of the eighth candidate is yet to be confirmed according to several other sources.
Senior advocates Jayant Nath, V Kameshwar Rao, Vibhu Bakhru, and Sanjeev Sachdeva, and advocate Najmi Waziri were recommended by the Supreme Court collegium and accepted by the government, according to the Hindustan Times on 12 April. Also recommended for elevation by the Delhi HC but rejected by the Supreme Court collegium citing “sharp division of opinion”, were senior advocates Sudhanshu Batra and Rajeev Kumar Virmani, and advocates Anusuya Salwan and Maninder Acharya - four names that were pending for two years now, according to the paper.
The four seniors in the list were all elevated to their status by the Delhi high court. Nath was designated a senior in 2006, Rao in 2010, and Bakhru and Sachdeva in 2011.
Vaish is the sitting registrar general of the HC since December 2010.
The Hindustan Times report on the collegium process stated that none of the Supreme Court judges’ adverse opinion on the recommendations were related to integrity or professional competence in a “confidential note sent to the government”. However, the collegium expressed concern at the growing number of complaints against those whose names were recommended for judgeship, and said that the complainants were people with “ulterior motives”.
On 19 March 2013, writ petitioner Deepak Khosla challenged Bakhru’s nomination to the court’s judgeship in Deepak Khosla V Hon’ble the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court & Ors.
In a letter to the president of India Khosla wrote: “A fraud is being played on your office. This man […] is facing perjury proceedings himself before the Delhi High Court, as well as disciplinary proceedings before the Bar Council of Delhi.” Khosla’s petition is currently pending in the Delhi HC.
Correction 15:19: The original version of this story erroneously stated that Sunita Gupta was an advocate and not a district judge. The error is regretted.
Update 16 April: Additional district judge Deepa Sharma was confirmed as the eighth person to recieve presidential assent for elevation to the Delhi HC [PIB]
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
No matter ; all that the obstruction means is that owing to the fait accompli targetted by them, now, a writ of quo warranto shortly follows, and citing all these mala fide acts as the desperate measures of an institution that has been caught with its hands in the till.
I guess that in a country where the Attorney General of India (Mr. Vahanvati) is fighting an application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking registration of an FIR against him (by Vishwanath Chaturvedi) for filing false rrpoerts before the SC in the Mulayam Singh Yadav case, where an Addl. Solicitor General of India (Harin Raval) is accused of perjury before no less than the SC (in the Coalgate scam), where the Law Minister is accused of committing criminal contempt (by interfering with the CBI report in the Coalgate scam), where the CBI Director is contemplating - as an option (!) what a laugh ! - whether to commit perjury (in order to protect the Law Minister) or not - I guess it would take more than a lawyer who is facing perjury and still being elevated to Judgeship of the same HC where he is facing perjury to shock our national conscience.
Well, they say that he who laughs last laughs the hardest.....and they also say that Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned.....in this case, the woman is poor ol' Lady Justice......so, onwards we march......Balle Balle !
Deepak Khosla, , 099 530 96650
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first