Bombay High Court

Jharkhand HC designates 0 women, 6 men to senior counsel, including bar council chair Rajiv Ranjan

Six new senior advocates were designated in the Jharkhand high court, including Jharkhand bar council chairman Rajiv Ranjan, on 29 April.

The other five newly designated seniors in the high court are Birendra Kumar Poddar, Raj Nandan Sahay, Anil Kumar, Sanjiv Kumar and Ajit Kumar, according to a notification on the high court’s website.

The Bombay high court also had a round on 8 May in which seven new seniors were designated.

Bombay HC makes 7 new senior counsel (but only 1 woman): HRLN’s Gayatri Singh & Mihir Desai; Rajiv Chavan, Sanjeev Gorwadkar

The Bombay high court has designated the seven advocates as senior lawyers.

Amit Desai (no Salve) wins much Bombay HC sympathy for Salman Khan with bail [UPDATE-1]

Read the trial court judgment that almost sent Salman Khan to jail

Ex-Khaitan Bombay HC litigator Ameya Gokhale to join Shardul Amarchand in Mumbai

Bombay high court advocate Ameya Gokhale, currently in the chambers of Pradeep Sancheti, is due to join the new Mumbai office of Amarchand Mangaldas Delhi managing partner Shardul Shroff as a partner, reported the Economic Times.

Gokhale left Khaitan & Co as a principal associate in August 2013, having joined in 2008 from an LLM at George Washington University Law School and two years at Amarchand where began his career after graduating from NLSIU Bangalore in 2005.

The end of an era (live & summarised): Amarchand Mangaldas split now official [CYRIL AFFIDAVIT & PRESS RELEASE]

The largest Indian law firm break-up ever is now official, after the Bombay high court today blessed the arbitral award arrived at after nearly six months of mediation between Amarchand Mangaldas Suresh A Shroff & Co managing partners and brothers, Cyril and Shardul Shroff.

Bombay HC upholds beef ban for now, next hearing on 25 June [UPDATE-1]

Cannabis should be legal in India, argues one lawyer’s petition in the Bombay high court

Advocate Aditya Barthakur has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Bombay high court challenging the criminalisation of cannabis under Indian law, based on the fact that none of six government organs he queried had any idea about how the herb is harmful to the human body.

BCI to SC: Foreign lawyers should not come to conferences in India

1000s of cases deferred across India in yesterday's BCI-called strike over lawyer-killing (Round-up)

Bombay HC raises max bench strength to 94 (though currently at only 65 sitting judges with 10 vacancies)

"The number of posts for judges in the Bombay high court has been increased from the current 75 to 94, announced chief minister Devendra Fadnavis in the legislative assembly on Friday. However, of the 75 existing posts, ten are vacant. So in effect there are only 65 judges,” reported the Times of India.

After months of gossip, SC collegium inducts Orissa HC chief Amitava Roy to apex court

NaMo: Retire 1,700 laws

NaMo inaugurates Mohit Shah's judicial museum in the Bombay high court

Another samaritan to save us all, gets magistrate FIR vs AIB & celebs for 'pornographic, obscene, vulgar show'

Read an offended law teacher’s PIL and what she (and apparently Christians and others) found offensive in the AIB roast; But, are the jokes illegal?

Parental advisoryParental advisoryDisclaimer: If you are easily offended, please DO NOT continue reading. We have shared content that is allegedly offensive, in order to allow reasoned and detached study and evaluation by legal professionals of the legal position.

Centre won't appeal Rs 3,200 cr Bombay HC Vodafone order: Is India finally done with tax terrorism?

Amarchand to split in two firms on 1 April (but ET rumours of Bharucha-Shardul tie-up almost certainly false)

Amarchand Mangaldas Delhi and Mumbai regions, managed by brothers Shardul and Cyril Shroff respectively, have agreed to split into two firms by 1 April 2015, confirmed three independent sources.

Law ministry proposes renaming Bombay & Madras high courts to Mumbai & Chennai

The Department of Justice in the law ministry has begun drafting a bill to rename the Bombay and Madras high courts to Mumbai and Chennai high courts, respectively, reported the PTI.

The two high courts were established under the Indian High Court Act, 1861 alongside the Calcutta high court, and have so far resisted attempts to be renamed in line with their hosting cities.

Mafatlal socialite wedding's 14-year-old disputed debt to Taj hotels returns to Bombay civil court with Mulla & Mulla

Mediation & Cyril Shroff affidavit deadline extended to Feb in Amarchand dispute

The deadline for filing the Bombay high court counter affidavit by Amarchand Mangaldas Mumbai managing partner Cyril Shroff to rebut his brother Shardul’s case has been extended for the second time to 20 February 2015.

The court-sanctioned mediation between the brothers has been extended too from its earlier closing date of 31 December 2014 to the end fo January, after a Bombay high court hearing yesterday.

Shardul Shroff in talks to open offices on brother's turf as mechanics of 2 Amarchands raised in mediation [Update-1]

Bombay HC rejects advocate’s service tax argument that lawyers provide no “value addition” for clients

Cyril Shroff affidavit deadline extended to 31 December as mediation between Amarchand Mumbai-Delhi continues

Cong challenges BJP gov't Maha assembly majority in Bombay HC

The Congress’ Maharashtra unit Wednesday moved Bombay high court challenging the constitutional validity of the Devendra Fadnavis-led BJP government and seeking its dismissal.

Former minister M Naseem Khan filed a writ petition before the court questioning the constitutional validity of the nearly month-old government and terming it as “illegal”.

Justice VM Kanade has posted the matter for hearing Friday (Nov 28), he said.

After the Oct 15 elections, Maharashtra threw up a fractured verdict in which the Bharatiya Janata Party secured 123 seats (which came to 122 after a legislator’s death), the Shiv Sena got 63, the Congress 42 and the Nationalist Congress Party 41, with the remaining 18 going to independents and smaller parties.

“Fadnavis approached the Governor C V Rao to stake claim to form the government claiming it had the requisite majority in the 288-member assembly, and was asked to prove it (majority) within 15 days,” Khan, a legislator from Mumbai, told IANS

However, Khan said that the vote of confidence in the assembly Nov 12 was passed by a voice vote.

“Nobody knows how many MLAs (legislators) voted in favour of the government or against it in the voice vote. Our stand is that this remains a minority government which does not enjoy the confidence of the house and must be dismissed immediately,” he contended.

Later the Congress and Shiv Sena had led separate delegations to Governor Rao questioning the validity of the Nov 12 trust vote.

Khan also claimed that all the major decisions taken by this government are “illegal” and must be set aside.

Former additional solicitor-general of India B A Desai and former solicitor-general of India TR Andhyarujina will appear on behalf of Khan in the case.

Fadnavis was sworn-in as chief minister Oct 31 at the head of a 10-member ministry which is likely to be expanded shortly.

Latest comments