“In a major setback to the US- based fast food chain McDonald's in India, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) today restored its estranged partner Vikram Bakshi as the Managing Director of Connaught Plaza Restaurant Ltd. The tribunal has said the meeting of Connaught Plaza Restaurants Ltd (CPRL) of August 6, 2013 in which Bakshi was removed as MD of the company was illegal, unjust and malafide,” reported the PTI.

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas Delhi partner Tejas Karia, senior associate Manavendra Mishra and associate Karan Mehra briefed senior advocate SN Mookherjee and instructed advocated Pritpal Nijjar for Vikram Bakshi and Bakshi Holdings.

Dua Associates Gurgaon partners Rahul P Dave and Amit Dhingra and associates Sumit Chopra and Shivam Raheja, instructed advocate on record Rahul Narayan and advocates Rohan Jaitley and Naira Jeejeebhoy and briefed senior advocates Sudipto Sarkar and Iqbal M Chagla for McDonald's India and its nominee directors Robert Dale Larson and Ayesel Melbye.

Advocates Satyajit Sarna and Mohit Negi briefed senior advocate Arun Kathpalia for Connaught Plaza Restaurants General Manager Legal Devinder Jain.

Bakshi fought a 3-year legal battle contending that he was ousted from the post of McDonald's India's managing director (MD) in an “illegal, mala fide, malicious and oppressive” manner which violated the terms of the joint venture agreement with the intention of buying him out at lower valuations, according to Mint.

“In 2013, McDonald’s had voted against the re-election of Bakshi as managing director of Connaught Plaza, following which Bakshi challenged his removal in the Company Law Board (now the National Company Law Tribunal ), accusing McDonald’s of mismanagement and oppression,” Mint reported.

A two-member National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) bench headed by president justice MM Kumar said that the decision to remove Bakshi as managing director of McDonald's India was “illegal, unlawful, unjust and malicious”, and ordered:

It is well settled that if the parties have understood the contents of a contract/document by acting upon it in particular manner, then it is not possible to accept any contrary interpretation or proposition.

Moreover the translation of intentions of the parties in practice from 1995 to 2013 cannot be brushed aside by adopting an interpretation which would be contrary to the understanding of the parties of the whole contract to justify one sole deviation.

Advocate Deepak Khosla had intervened in the case alleging perjury against Bakshi, however dismissing his submissions the bench ordered that it is not open to an unrelated intervenor to raise perjury allegations in this case, and also in general there were no findings of perjury against Bakshi in the case. Khosla was not available for comment at the time of going to press.

Bakshi's dispute with McDonald's US management had led to 43 out of 55 McDonald's outlets in Delhi shutting shop on 29 June after their licences expired, as reported by NDTV.

Read the NCLT order (PDF)

Click to show 12 comments
at your own risk
(alt+shift+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Nail in the Coffin 14 Jul 17, 17:55
Gopal Mookherjee and Sudipto Sarkar - Biggies from the Calcutta Bar representing both sides. Wow!! Its time to capture Delhi!! Additionally,
briefed by the Delhi Firms SAM and Dua.

What fantastic gentleman these two people are!!
Reply Report to LI
2
Show?
Like +4 Object -1 On a roll... 14 Jul 17, 19:55
SAM seems to be THE place to go for litigation!!
Tata victory over Mistry
Bakshi victory over McDonalds
Nestle/Maggie victory over Baba Ramdev and co.
SAM victory over CAM
Reply Report to LI
2.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -1 Neutral 15 Jul 17, 18:27
Lol, obviously the Delhi based SAM would be better than CAM at litigation.

Look at Mumbai and the more ubiquitous corporate practice and it's CAM and AZB all the way!
Reply Report to LI
2.1.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 What is in a name 17 Jul 17, 02:03
Even SAM Bombay will outperform all the big shot litigation firms in Bombay. Very soon.After all it is the Delhi prodigy of litigation.
Reply Report to LI
2.1.2
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 rumour mill 17 Jul 17, 15:33
is that the judgment was written by sam
Reply Report to LI
2.1.2.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Atta chakki 23 Jul 17, 23:52
Bhai bahar Nikal, duniya dekh, judgment padh phir hosh Sambhal.
Reply Report to LI
3
Like +16 Object -1 Guest 14 Jul 17, 19:57  interesting  top rated
Vicky and Surdie. Great to see your names here. Congrats.
Reply Report to LI
3.1
Like +5 Object -1 Sway 15 Jul 17, 23:07
Still going strong eh you two. First it was the basketball court and now in the real Courts. Well done Mishra and Sarna.
Reply Report to LI
3.2
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Bara Maja 17 Jul 17, 15:15
I know who this is.
Reply Report to LI
4
Show?
Like +3 Object -2 SAMite 14 Jul 17, 21:25
Karan Mehra was a Principal associate. Also Mishra and Mehra have both left the firm.
Reply Report to LI
4.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -3 Fact 17 Jul 17, 12:35
That is correct. In fact, Karan continued to be engaged as an outside counsel in this matter.
Reply Report to LI
4.1.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 Rumour 20 Jul 17, 01:32
And continued to do nothing like he did when he was in the firm... All the work was done by Tejas who argued the matter.
Reply Report to LI

refreshSort chronologically Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.