Comments for Wadia takes ELP Masters' Cricket Cup crown at http://www.legallyindia.com , comment 1 to 12 out of 12 comments http://www.legallyindia.com Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:48:59 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-2029 too funny - Anonymous Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:35:33 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-2027 @ 9 & 10, Longgggg comments and using words like 'sour grapes' and 'crying babies' makes it very evident that somebody is trying to justify their so called 'INTEGRITY' and making it very apparent that rules were bypassed. Grow up guys. Enjoy your success dudes and dont justify your stands whatever it is or it was. It has brought you success and u should bask in its glory rather then answering / defending or claryfying, thats what a true champion is and you guys have just proved it otherwise. - Anonymous Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:18:16 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-2017 I guess it is always the case of 'sour grapes', and as i had always maintained, 'people with questionable or nil sporting spirit always cry 'foul'.' In addition to the post by Amit may I add that the match against JSA where 2 articles and not 3 were allowed to play and that too was done after consultation with, and after taking the permission of the JSA captain(I must commend his sportsman spirit) and ELP's tournament director. As there was a shortage of players at that point of time it was decided by JSA captain and the Organizers to allow the articles to play for that one match. That was the understanding on which the 2 articles played in that match. The rest of the matches were played without any single articles participating in the rest of the matches. Rest of the facts have been clarified in Amit's post hereinabove. Further, the rules mandated that only and only 'qualified profesionals' representing the firm and not 'qualified lawyers' were allowed to participate so I think there is some mistake of facts there. If we were to get into the debate as to whether the said articles were 'qualified professionals' or not we can debate that at length. Lets not extend that in this forum. We at Wadia Ghandy have always kept INTEGRITY over and above anything else, Hence its quite saddening when allegations baseless and false, such as these are made. Having said that we are not required to answer any queries nor clarify our positions to anyone. We won it fair and square and we dont require to clarify that to random 'cry-babies' crying foul in this forum. SASWATA MITRA WG & CO - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:53:03 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-2006 @2 & 6, It is really sad to see your comments which are in poor light. The least you guys could have done before putting your comments is to get your facts right. Being part of the Wadia Ghandy team let me clarify to everyone that wadia had before the start of the tournament, sought a clarification from ELP and were informed that 2 article clerks will be permitted to play. It was only before our 2nd league match, we were informed that no articles are permitted and thereafter from the 3rd match onwards as per the instructions of ELP no articles were part of the team (facts may be confirmed with ELP) including for the semis and finals. So never question wadia ghandy's integrity on and off the field and whoever was present at the ground would know that we played hard and in the right spirit and won fair and square. So be more careful with your comments especially if Wadia Ghandy is involved and as a lawyer please keep in mind the golden rule that is to always get your facts right. Amit Manubarwala Wadia Ghandy & Co - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:57:42 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1995 I think it was a fabulous tournament and full marks to the organizers for a very well organized tournament. I look forward to playing again next year. Sameer Sah Majmudar & Co. - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:25:51 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1993 What happened to the Senior Counsels vs. Senior Partners match?? [Senior counsel won the exhibition match but I am not sure of the score. Anyone? -Kian] - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:23:24 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1992 Despite of the clear communications / instructions made to the playing teams, apparently Wadia played in the semi final and final with three aricle clerks (still pursuing law), although it was told very clearly to them that only two articles are allowed (who should be qualified lawyers), since the tournament was organised for qualified professionals and trainees and interns were specifically excluded. Anyways, many congratulations to the winner and accolades to ELP for organising a fantastic tournamment which provides a great platform for the professionals to bond. - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:18:04 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1991 ELP has organised the tournament only twice.. in 2009 and this edition in 2010.. so i think that also needs to be corrected.. while both the times the finalists were ELP and Wadia Ghandy, ELP won in 2009 while Wadia Ghandy won in 2010.. as regards the interpretation of rules, the final decision was of the tournament director and by his directions have we all abided! - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:10:28 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1989 This was second year ELP has organised the tournament and not three years. Last year winners were ELP and not Wadia Ghandy. - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:47:20 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1984 @2: There is a song by Whitesnake "Here I go again" lets just modify it and say for your comment "Here we go again". The match is over da, Wadia has the cup and the glory. Forget about it. If there were to be disqualified they should have been in the first place. Whats the use now tell me. - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:11:43 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1981 its surprising why wadiadint get dis qualified , because they played their very first match of the ELP Cup against Tri Legal with non lawyer interns against rules of the ELP CUP. - Anonymous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:41:23 +0100 http://www.legallyindia.com/20100118397/Law-firms/wadia-takes-elp-masters-cricket-cup-crown#comment-1978 There are a few errors in the article: 1. Wadia Ghandy's name is spelt wrongly as "Wadia Gandhy". 2. Sagar Divekar's name is spelt wrongly as "Sagar Divawakar". 3. In the final, ELP batted first. 4. The last six of the match was hit by Sagar Divekar and not Amit Manubarwala, as Amit had retired after scoring 36, which eventually got him the Man of the Match award in the Final. - shivanand2989 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:37:45 +0100