[advertisement]
 

LegallyIndia.com

Weekly newsletter



| Share

Create an account  |  Forgot your password?
Home

Law minister ditched from Cabinet - death knell for reforms or needed boost?

Print

Law-Minister-HR-Bhardwaj

Incumbent Law Minister H R Bhardwaj has been dropped from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's new Cabinet in a surprise round of appointments today that could derail the process of India's judicial and legal reform.

With continuity being a prized quality in Indian political progress, it is still unclear who will get the law and justice portfolio and whether the existing course of reform will be held.

One Delhi lawyer, who preferred not to be named, said: "If he had come in, we would probably be looking at a December opening. But now that he is not and some non-descript person is slated to come in, I think it is open for speculation."

Mulla & Mulla & Blunt & Caroe partner Shardul Thacker disagreed and tipped two prominent lawyers for the post. "This change will not in any manner hamper the legal liberalisation of entry of foreign law firms," he said.

Thacker argued that it was expected that Bhardwaj (pictured) would be dropped: "It only means that they would bring in someone more effective to ensure that judicial reforms are accelerated – filling in vacancies of judges, improving the system for clearing the backlog, which is mounting up even in the Supreme Court."

Thacker said that there would likely be two lawyers in the running for the Law and Justice post: India National Congress member Kapil Sibal and Harvard LLM and former Science minister Salman Khursheed. "Knowing them both," he said, "my personal view is that they are both very experienced and capable of heading the law ministry and improving its performance."

Another Mumbai partner is more doubtful. "This may derail the process of liberalisation as we were close to opening up," he said. "With P C [Chidambaram] heading home I am not sure who will get this berth, it will be interesting."

The Delhi partner said that Commerce & Industry was the key deciding Ministry, which was likely to continue being staffed by minister Kamal Nath. "I think given our trade off on legal services with farm subsidies - which are critical for the country - I think it's inevitable that we have to open. Its just a question of when and in what form."

The Economic Times claimed that Gandhi-loyalist Bhardwaj's exclusion was primarily due to the embarrassment he caused the government.

The paper wrote: "His bungling of the office of profit legislation caused immense embarrassment to the government. The then President A P J Abdul Kalam withheld his assent to the legislation, forcing the government to rework the bill.

"The law minister’s mishandling of the government affidavit on the Rama Sethu proved to be yet another gaffe. More recently he flagrantly used the law ministry and its senior officers as instruments of the Congress in major CBI cases. Each effort simply made it tougher for Congress to keep a straight face while saying it believed in clean governance."

Bhardwaj was Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs between 1992 and 1996, and served as Minister of Law and Justice from 2004 to date.

Comments (5)Add Comment
NB: The comments below are the personal views and opinions expressed by readers and are not those of Legally India. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please send us a message with your objection and contact details and we will review it as soon as practicable.
0
#1 ...
written by Betting man, 28 May 2009 03:57
I do not quite agree that H.R Bharadwaj's departure will hurt the reform process in any way - if you talk to the right people in the Law Ministry and the regulatory bodies - you will get the feeling that most are happy to see his back.

As regards the new appointment - I would put my money on Salman Khurshid - but many more important people have lost money on such things!!!!!
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#2 ...
written by a guest, 28 May 2009 04:36
He may be barking up the wrong tree completely. Kapil Sibal does not want the Law Ministry and has given his sons being in practice as an excuse to not be there. Khurseed, I don't know.

But my Delhi sources say that it could be some not-so-high-profile chap!
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#3 ...
written by Euss, 28 May 2009 05:22
Yet another setback. I don't think we will see liberalisation in the next decade.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#4 ...
written by a guest, 28 May 2009 07:38
No matter who becomes law minister, the most imptant thing everyone is watching is whether the new Congress government will put the legal market at the top of its agenda.

To be honest, there are probably more immediately pressing matters in India right now than whether foreign law firms can enter the market or not.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#5 ...
written by partner, 28 May 2009 10:30
Mr Bhardwaj was a basic loyalist, he didn't do a lot apart from one thing that's viewed positively: opening up legal services. Everywhere else, it is unfortunate to say, his record is very poor.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Create an account  |  Forgot your password?

Twitter feed

Anything for an adjournment! Hearing in Ruchika case adjourned after attack on Rathore http://bit.ly/9cMCud RT @MumbaiCentral
Australia is hot! After Norton Rose, Allen & Overy now to set up shop in Oz, gutting Clayton Utz http://is.gd/7VmTk
And here's the current list of #IndianLawyers on Twitter: http://is.gd/7KgO4 Know more? Add them: http://is.gd/7K136 RT @gkjohn
Eversheds India head Gauri Advani arranged 'bribe' to state official in 2002, says UK High Court http://is.gd/7Gcvv

week in focus

Where is the love? / Issue 34
article thumbnailThis week J Sagar Associates (JSA) partner Nishith Dhruva left the firm to set up his own practice. And on good...
For future issues:



Legal opinions

Opinion: Collective's wisdom; Should foreign firms be allowed at all?
article thumbnailTo me it appears childish to pose the query "until when can entry of foreign lawyers be prevented in India", says Bhasin & Co managing partner and Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) chairman...

Latest features

Are female Indian lawyers outpacing Western colleagues?
article thumbnail"Law was often looked at as a marriage degree - three years in law, then you get married," recalls AZB founding partner Zia Mody about women's views of a legal...

Latest Comments

Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
hey u 'll pay for this popat..... [kidding]... hope u keep urself busy wid this ...
Does law student suicide question whether lawyers ...
i really can't comment about others but thankfully ragging is not an issue in na...
Symbi into top 10 as US mooters sweeps Indian team...
Nice post!
PROVINCE OF LIFE DETERMINED
Are you a poet or a philosopher? What is a poet: A philosopher whose words rhyme...
Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
By the same logic - your mom named you legalpopat?
Careers Counsel: How do I write the best law firm ...
I have noticed that people tend to use single letters in place of full words at ...
'Illegality' charges derail Delhi Bar Council exec...
Good Start!
The Calcutta High Court website
yes its true and very sad indeed ... I, being from kolkata, m aware of this prob...
Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
Which law school did you qualify from? And where did you get trained?
Opinion: Collective's wisdom; Should foreign firms...
This article is the clinching argument for allowing foreign law firms - that we ...

Email us now


Online Lawyers

9 users and 1400 guests online

Latest forum posts

More posts...