Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow claimed secrecy for the three CLAT memorandums of understanding (MoU) signed between national law universities (NLU) since 2007.

The convenor with a letter dated 1 July rejected a Right to Information (RTI) request dated 10 June 2015, which was filed by the Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access (IDIA) scheme, asking for a copy each of the MoU signed between seven NLUs on 23 November 2007, and the MoUs signed between 14 NLUs in 2014 and on 10 May 2015.

The convenor, via RMLNLU joint registrar Dr JD Gangwar, rejected the request stating that the information was exempt from disclosure under “Section 8(e)” of the RTI Act 2005.

There is no Section 8(e) under the Act, however Section 8, which lists the exemptions permitted under the Act, provides in its clause (1)(e) that:

Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information

As reported last month in Mint and Legally India, this year’s CLAT is likely to generate at least Rs 16 crore, of which half would go to RMLNLU after deducting the expenses of holding the CLAT.

In 2012 Nalsar Hyderabad had responded to an RTI filed by Legally India that under the 23 November 2007 MoU, India’s first seven NLUs had agreed to discontinue their separate law entrance tests from the year 2008 onwards and admit students through the CLAT, which was to be conducted by each of the seven signatories by rotation each year.

RMLNLU Lucknow, which was not in existence in 2007 and therefore not a signatory to the 2007 MoU, could not have conducted CLAT under its terms. Since by 2014 each of the seven signatories had convened CLAT once, a new MoU was entered into between 14 NLUs to enable the newer NLUs to convene the CLAT, as reported by Legally India in November 2014.

RMLNLU vice chancellor Prof Gurdip Singh had told Legally India that the new MoU, among other things, spelled out the terms under which a new law university could be admitted to the CLAT.

Gangwar, who in an interview with Legally India in June had claimed the convenor was committed to transparency, was not reachable for comment by phone and messages today.

The same RTI was sent to NLSIU Bangalore and Nalsar Hyderabad; no response has yet been received.

RTI responseRTI response

Click to show 7 comments
at your own risk
(alt+shift+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
1
Like +9 Object -4 CLAT Surcharge 06 Jul 15, 19:25  interesting
In all fairness, from next year the CLAT Organizing Committee should hike the CLAT Exam Fee by a few thousands rupees as a surcharge for the litigation expenses that will follow. After all, litigation is the key cost component in organizing this highly respected national competitive examination.
Reply Report to LI
2
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 Robin 07 Jul 15, 01:41
MoU is never a fiduciary information.
Reply Report to LI
3
Like +4 Object -0 Spellcheck 07 Jul 15, 10:59
ROFL. From Gangwar to Ganwar. Smell a fish?
Reply Report to LI
3.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 kianganz 07 Jul 15, 11:55
Thanks and apologies, corrected...
Reply Report to LI
4
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Guest 08 Jul 15, 21:40
Kian when will you do your long-awaited NLU faculty assessment/ranking? Please do it. Bar and Bench tried it but theirs was a disgrace (CNLU Patna was rated higher than Harvard per their criteria: LOL).

Also, you should ask some senior counsels who are on the board of NLUs why NLU alumni are not joining NLUs as faculty. People with LLMs from NLUs and LLBs from C-grade colleges may be joining but not people with LLB degrees from NLUs. It is not related to salary. The real truth is politics and corruption by the admin.
Reply Report to LI
4.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Curious 08 Jul 15, 23:05
Quoting Guest:
Kian when will you do your long-awaited NLU faculty assessment/ranking? Please do it. Bar and Bench tried it but theirs was a disgrace (CNLU Patna was rated higher than Harvard per their criteria: LOL).

Also, you should ask some senior counsels who are on the board of NLUs why NLU alumni are not joining NLUs as faculty. People with LLMs from NLUs and LLBs from C-grade colleges may be joining but not people with LLB degrees from NLUs. It is not related to salary. The real truth is politics and corruption by the admin.

Quoting Guest:
Kian when will you do your long-awaited NLU faculty assessment/ranking? Please do it. Bar and Bench tried it but theirs was a disgrace (CNLU Patna was rated higher than Harvard per their criteria: LOL).

Also, you should ask some senior counsels who are on the board of NLUs why NLU alumni are not joining NLUs as faculty. People with LLMs from NLUs and LLBs from C-grade colleges may be joining but not people with LLB degrees from NLUs. It is not related to salary. The real truth is politics and corruption by the admin.


Are there ANY graduates (LLBs) from the top 3-4 NLUs teaching in NLUs or their own alma maters ? Would be a good point to know.
Reply Report to LI
4.1.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 anon 09 Jul 15, 01:29
Very few people. Kian and Prachi why can't you do this story? Every day there are 2-3 articles on law firm movements but you have done 0 articles on faculty recruitment. I wonder if Legally India is deliberately not covering this story to protect a certain law school? If LI does a story on faculty recruitment then it will automatically show the following ranking in terms of faculty quality: NLUD > Nalsar > NLSIU. So who benefits if Kian does not cover the story? wink wink ;)

Also, a huge scam will be unearthed when it is found that NLU grads with LLMs from top law schools abroad have been turned down by corrupt VCs who favour their own chelas from rubbish universities.
Reply Report to LI

refreshSort chronologically Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.