Experts & Views
With another round of CLAT and AILET exams drawing nearer, thousands of students will now have to decide where they want to spend the next five years of their lives learning the law. Below is my own experience of making a choice that raised eyebrows, almost a year ago.
The week preceding the 9th of June, 2013, was perhaps the longest of my life. The past month had been a whirlwind of unexpected good fortune as the result of one exam after another was released, and much to my (and others’) surprise, I had done quite well in all of them. While until two months ago I had been in the throes of insecurity that every Indian who writes his or her board exams goes through, wondering whether I would ever enter the gates of a half decent institution of higher education, I now had all three of my top choices in front of me, their hallowed portals invitingly open. I had managed to crack both the CLAT and the AILET, getting into the National Law School of India University, Bangalore (NLSIU) and the National Law University Delhi (NLUD) respectively. Furthermore, my board marks were sufficiently high for me to be eligible for a seat in St. Stephens College, to study History, my favourite subject. Now came the excruciatingly difficult choice: which of these great institutions to join, essentially giving up on two others that thousands of my peers had competed to get into. St. Stephens was disqualified first, following consultations with the parental units about the feasibility of a History degree, the scepticism over the efficacy of the Four Year Undergraduate Program (FYUP) to be implemented that year onwards at DU, and the many advantages of a professional degree. The contest remained between NLS and NLUD, the former the well-established, much revered Mecca of Indian legal education, the latter the young upstart with its star in the ascendant. After much consultation with elder and wiser individuals, immense and intense consideration and sleepless tossing and turning, I chose to let the deadline for reserving my spot at NLS pass me by on the 9th of June without doing so. Here are the reasons why, in no particular order:
We Are Young
There is something undeniably exciting about becoming part of something new and fast-growing. Only five years old at the time when I joined it, NLUD had produced only one batch, but in its short existence, had created quite a name for itself. From academics to debating to the jewel in the crown of any law school, mooting, NLUD had done phenomenally well. As a new law school, it is brimming with energy and drive, and under the leadership of our charismatic Vice Chancellor, Dr. Ranbir Singh, we have, and continue to, move onwards at a very impressive speed, with the top spot not too far. The student body itself is very enthusiastic and driven, with new groups and clubs coming up and working towards a bevy of different goals. NLUD has none of the stagnation and self-assured complacency that inevitably creeps into one’s mind when they know they are established and considered the best. To be a part of the growth of such an institution and be able to build it yourself is immensely attractive.
Show Me The Money
The sprawling campus and the amazingly well stocked library at NLUD are indicative of the wealth of the University. From the world class moot court hall to the enviable conference and meeting rooms, no expense has been spared to create a world class infrastructure for students. The legal education field being one which involves considerable expenses, it helps to be part of a law school that does not need to undertake great deliberations before spending its money for the furtherance of its student’s education. The fact that the college pays the entire expenses of participants in moot court competitions is very closely related to how well we have done in the same. This sort of generosity and willingness to spend money on worthy projects sets NLUD apart from all its competitors.
Home Is Where The Heart Is
Admittedly, this is a reason that might not apply to most, as it is personal, and to some people, stupid. However, the past year of law school has showed me how much of an advantage it is to be close to home. Having been a Delhite for the past eight years, I quite love this city. Being able to go to law school without having to catch a plane every time I want to come back home was a great draw. A legal degree is by no means an easy one, and can get very stressful and difficult. It helps immensely to be able to just catch a Metro and be back home, welcomed by home cooked food and the warmth of your parents. It allows one to unwind, relax and go back to work fighting fit. Moreover, the hundred tiny problems that accompany outstation students: laundry troubles, scrambling to go to the market, awkward forced interaction with some remote relatives who are your local guardians, are not something I have to worry about.
Location Location Location
New Delhi, being the capital of the country as well as the location of the Supreme Court, is the never centre of all things legal in India. Being able to study the law in a city so closely involved in its framing and interpretation is definitely an advantage. Internships are aplenty, with the most ambitious and talented amongst the students getting opportunities to work with Supreme Court lawyers. We also benefit from the close proximity of imminent persons of law and other fields of learning. In the past year itself, I have had the good fortune of listening to Mr. Shashi Tharoor, David Johnston, the Governor General of Canda, Prof. Timothy Endicott, the Dean at Oxford’s Law Faculty, and the venerable Ram Jethmalani, among others. NLUD’s greatest advantage, perhaps, is its location, an advantage that no other college can ever appropriate.
Second to None
In my (yet unconcluded) first year in NLUD, I have learnt that there is not a single solitary aspect where NLUD lags behind any other law school in this country in terms of providing its students with opportunities and facilities to do very well for themselves. The infrastructure, teachers and the kind of opportunities provided are second to none, and indeed much better than those at the older law schools. A driven, dedicated student is all it takes to make the best of what we are given and achieve success. Ultimately, it is upon us, as the students, to make what we may of what we have been given, and at NLUD, what is given is never inadequate.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
1. NLUD faculty is better
2. NLSIU is tough to adjust to for students not from South India
As for the second point, I've heard that too from friends who joined NLS, but somehow I don't count that as much of a deterrent for most people. What I wrote about being close to home, though, applies there. Going to NLS would mean being over two and a half thousand kilometers away from home and all the benefits that come with it.
1. If you made your choice based on being part of building a young institution or being part of an already big institution, you made the wrong choice. I'll give you an example: You got into Harvard Law School (an already established college which is also one of the best in the world) and Singapore Management University (an exciting and growing university but just not as good), you'd pick Harvard any day. Further, this opportunity of helping to build (as you call it) an institution exists whether the institution is young or not.
2. I agree, NLS neither has the best looking nor the most modern campus, but the question of being modern or beautiful shouldn't change the quality of education in either college. NLS has the best Law library in the country (which incidentally, is also very beautiful and modern). Also, more interestingly, in 2 years, NLS will have a seven-storied academic block which is supposed to be 'modern'. There, they showed you the money too.
I don't know your personal background but living away from home is always a great experience. But I agree, this one can't be argued with.
4. Agreed. Location is important. But if it's only because you get brilliant people to come down to lecture, it doesn't help as much as you say it does. In the past month itself, NLS had KK Venugopal, Soli Sorabjee, Ram Jethmalani, Former Chief Justice of India, Babu Rajendra to come down and deliver lectures. NLS has enough reputation to get these people down to speak.
Moreover, as far as internships go, NLS has two very very big advantages. One, all the big Corp Law firms have at least 3 alum as partners. This gets us more internships and jobs than everyone else. Two, we have holidays in the most random times in the year (January to March). This helps us secure internships without any competition from any other college.
Finally, a driven student from any college has the capacity to make it big. The opportunities that NLS and NLUD give us just make it much much much simpler. It is my submission that NLS, at this point in time, gives more opportunities than ANY other college in India.
As for the comparison, I'd like to wait till the time I'm closer to passing out to really assess where NLUD stands :)
Siddharth, recruitment is bound to be slow to begin with in the first couple of years of any institute, especially with stalwarts already established. However, its only increases each year, and I anticipate that it will be at par with any other National Law University by the time I pass out in 2018.
I made my choice not on any single one of the factors, but all of them combined, and I have said time and again that it isn't a choice I think everyone should make. It was just the best choice for me, and I still feel that way, almost a year into making it. I'd like to see my college grow, and I assure you that my parade hasn't been rained on or ruined. Thanks again for your rejoinders!
05.03.2014
NOTICE
All the students are hereby intimated that the University has decided not to pay fifty percent (50%) of Air Fare/Travel Charges for any international conferences, seminar, Judging MootCourts Competitions etc with effect from 1st March, 2014. The students will have to bear expenses on their own in case if they wish to participate in the above events.
The University will pay only for the participation in Moot Court Competitions duly forwarded by the concerned faculty advisor.
(By Order) Sd/-
Registrar
At a time with the money collected for CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT at 31.9 lacs & maintenance of the website costing 66 lacs the Admin sure is busy engaged in activities for student welfare I must say. The 21 crore as unspent funds is quite the brilliant topping.
I enjoyed reading it, but I'm afraid I did not find it very well done.
www.legallyindia.com/201404174613/Law-schools/nlu-delhi-12-day-zero-offers-10-jobs-in-bag-3-foreign-vac-schemes-for-2015-batch
Please don't commit the blunder of choosing NLUD over NLSIU/NALSAR/NUJS.
I wrote it to dispel the exact sort of ignorance that leads you to say 99% of us didn't get in elsewhere.
Toppers of CLAT fail to get admission in NLS Delhi
allindiantaxes.com/ait-news-307.php?
Toppers of CLAT fail to get admission in NLS Delhi.
allindiantaxes.com/ait-news-307.php
NLS Campus: You should consider the fact that most of the campus was 25 built years ago and it is expanding. They are improving it. We are happy with whatever infrastructure we have.
This is not a inter-college fight. As a law aspirant, you all might want to understand why so many people pick NLUD. It's not because they are sissies or mama's boys. They see potential. And are not afraid to take the chance.
"Oh I can tell the difference between disbelief and aggression, and some of these comments fall squarely within the second category. I don't think it makes me 'cool' or a maverick, and I don't expect to be the poster boy, and frankly, nobody cares enough to do that. Again, you're assuming I did it to be cool and you're assigning reasons to my decision that I never used myself. Perhaps come off the high horse a little? I do not feel cool or smug, it was just a choice I made. If only you could understand that."
Well ... having once been an immature kid myself I can understand if one of the factors that led to your choosing NLUD over NLSIU was the thought that you could always carry a small chip on your shoulder. But since you say that is not the case, I can assure you as someone who has spent a decade in the profession and who has had ample time to review and watch all these law schools and who has no reason to get into a mine-is-bigger-than-yours argument that the choice was most certainly a foolhardy one. To use a crude example, its like a aspiring cricketer from Bengal choosing the Bangladesh cricket team over Australia for naive reasons like Bangladesh being closer to home, they speak a common language, etc.
Also, I must sympathize with the cosseted nature of your household if it's enough of a reason to make you crave the sort of autonomy only living a thousand miles away would afford.
You're being disingenuous if you think things at NLS are going fine. The quality of the faculty at NLUD is incomparable; some of the teachers at NLS can barely speak better English than the administrative staff at the college. The students have settled in to this malaise where they're content with an effective mastering of the marks-based system, and mediocrity abounds.
Akshat was merely driving home the point, that given his particular circumstances and priorities, NLUD seemed like a fair choice; not that this operates as a uniform rule. It bespeaks your lack of intelligence that you think there exists such a universal pecking order. Also, in my own humble opinion, I think it's cravenly for someone to resort to a personal barb at the author only because your superiority complex was disturbed with a contrarian opinion.
Infra: NLUD
Placements: NLS
Student Crowd: NLS (Assuming that ranks indicate better crowd)
Faculty: NLUD
The article keeps driving us to believe that you chose to stay there as it was closer to home.
Why can u not express views simply because you want to.
While attempting the exam we face a lot of anxiety and are not able to do well or upto our expectations.
waiting for a reply :)
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first