An estimated 5-minute read
 Email  Facebook  Tweet  Linked-in

Sharad Pawar, slapped"Why this kolaveri di ?," is asked of the overnight celeb slapper.

A rhetorical question. No one needs an answer to that one. Aam junta sentiment is all too visible. Wide dissatisfaction over government policies and immense satisfaction over the Sharad Pawar slapping incident, prevails. "The guy had it coming, man...", they say. "At least someone is doing some good..."

The verdict: Sharad Pawar is going to be the butt of internet jokes for some time now.

But reflect on it a bit and it is all too clear the incident has ominous potency. In this post, I will discuss some of the systemic maladies of which the incident is a symptom and why it should scare us. As citizens. As members of a society. And as humans.

Who decides what someone deserves?

The major problem with street justice of the kind evidenced in Pawar's case is that a random guy deciding that he deserves a slap. Now of course, it can be argued that it's not just him but the general public is frustrated with the governance, and hence it is "democratic" justice. However, arguing for majority win is actually treading very dangerous grounds, because what the majority wants may not always be sane or adequately justified. Take Khap Panchayats for example- wherein there is a definite community consensus to condemn inter-caste marriages by killing. But does that justify the honor killings? No.

So, popular sentiment as justice is out as an option. Though public sentiment should be taken into account to decide what is just, it can hardly be the determining criterion. The individual needs to be protected against an impassioned, and often irrational tendency of the crowd. And that's why we have law to decide what someone deserves. Including Pawar. Therefore, as members of the Indian society, we should be very scared when random people start serving their own brand of justice.

Disconnect between the aam aadmi and law

The next thing to be scared about as a member of the legal fraternity is the sheer amount of frustration a common person has against law. For it is this law which is easily manipulated, used by our political "leaders" for their own ends unto bad governance. The tendency in such a scenario, often is to undermine the entire basis for law itself. But one should remember that it is awful implementation and not the needlessness of law itself which is the problem here.

The problem, essentially is that those governed are unable to see the rationale and the need for law. Why this disconnect with the people, when it is primarily for their benefit that law exists? This is a growing concern for the legal system in India. Law is hardly supposed to be authoratorian- "Humne jo keh diya, keh diya. Bas!" (Rough translation: I've said what I had to. No more shall be entertained on this point.)

That is not how law is supposed to work at all! Yet it seems this is how law in India is working- with little regard for the concerns of the common people. And this is a scary aspect because such a system which ignores popular distress is highly unsustainable. People will eventually grow tired of it and be reduced to a position whereby they have to take drastic action (a small evidence of which is provided in the Pawar slapping case). And simple coercion by the State and police won't work when thousands are on the streets. Either way it foretells a massacre. To pre-empt this scenario, the need of the hour is therefore, to make law connect to people. To make people see the rationale on which law operates.

You could be next...

Now for the frustrated optimist in the public who thinks that people out on the streets in disregard of law is a good thing - we need a revolution like Egypt, Libya etc., here my friend, is why you should be scared.

Today it's Pawar on the receiving end of that slap, tomorrow it could easily be you or your friend, relative or spouse. And no law to protect you or them (not even one in theory), no apologies, haha! For like I pointed earlier - without law, there is no reasonable standard to decide what's right and what's not. So you might think you're doing the right thing, another group of people will hardly think so, and then Boom! Paw! Dishoom!... you know the rest of the story.

Perspectives, my man...they are so widely different. You cannot ever risk ignoring that truth.

The right means to further a cause

Gandhi was a pretty sensible chap when he said, "Ends do not justify the means." Now I know most of us are heavily disillusioned by anything Gandhi said or did, but for once try being objective and consider this statement outside of the "quotes by Gandhi" light.

The point being even if one's intentions are good, using the wrong means to propagate them doesn't gather much support for one's cause. So members of the public, I know you all mean very well. There is exploitation, corruption and bad policy decisions by the government and they need to go alright.

But please be careful about how you project your cause and your demands. A slap on the face might indeed make for a good laugh but it will seriously harm the anti-corruption cause in the long run. No one looks at what you really mean to say unless you say it the right way. People always look at your presentation first, your reason only later. And if the presentation is bad no one will even go peeking into what you meant to say- they'll just talk about how badly you said it. And that's usually the end of it.

And this is a very important reason for us, as responsible citizens, to be scared about the Pawar incident. The bad packaging of our anti-corruption cause therein is now taking it into all the wrong directions, even while drawing focus away from the core issue itself.

My concluding point... Stop laughing mindlessly for a while at all those "Sharad Pawar got slapped...wheee!" jokes on Facebook, and reflect. It may seem like a stupid, politicised incident, but it has way larger implications for you, personally, than you are being led to believe.

Click to show 11 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
Like +0 Object -0 Sachin Girpade 26 Nov 11, 23:33
This is very shame that only one slap and only one leader it should be applied for all party and all leaders .For Example congress(Manmohan and all) Shiv Sena (Bal & Party) Manse(Raj & Party) ,BSP(Mayawati & Party)........
Every Person Should come on the Road and should apply Unlimted slap for Each part & Each leader.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 neha pant 26 Nov 11, 23:37
it is very happy subject that one leader slapped. but anna hazare whatever said was totally right only one slap....
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 legalbird 27 Nov 11, 01:19
wow, reading the above two comments, I feel like killing myself. Why did I even bother writing. -_-
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 jadhav 28 Nov 11, 09:59
people like harvinder , are less .Nice job harvinder. We can get thousand sharad pawar. but good people like harvinder are less.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Tarachand chavan "legal egal" 29 Nov 11, 16:58
People need good governance, if leadership fails, It should be changed or people will change them. Please don't test Indian people, there is Gandhiji and Harvinder also. I appreciate Harvinder, because he has done what common want to do. Thanks Harvinder.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Tarachand chavan "legal egal" 29 Nov 11, 17:08
Where is another Harvinder, I am waiting for him. There are so many Ministers & leaders in line.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 A 30 Nov 11, 14:25
Legal bird - Farmers have committed suicide because of Pawar. Crores of money stashed in Swiss Banks, stolen by him. We know law and enforcement can never touch Pawar, so this slap is nothing but a symbolic gesture from common man like Harvinder to vent his anger on people like Pawar. Don't worry, we are not that insensible to completely discard rule of law. People have basic sense !
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 GK 02 Dec 11, 11:20
I've always thought Sharad Pawar fared a tiny bit better than a mosquito. I would rather the Sardarji had used a stronger repellent.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Sam 20 Dec 11, 18:34
Go ahead legalbird... and take a few politicians with you while you're at it!
Everything has a time and place.
Gandhi wasn't the first freedom fighter...
Time for Gandhi will come
For now, Inquilaab
just kidding.. but it's good to scare our servants into place once in a while...
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 thereader 24 Feb 12, 01:46
y did u even bother writing? could have done better by saying that y did u even bother about reacting to the comments of the people who don't see your point...In your words "Perspectives...are so different"...

For the records, I do. Well written. You've not only made the right points but also put them in a coherent well-done for that...Violence of course has a temporary shelf life...and as the great Asoka realized...has some adverse effects on both the sides involved...

Having said that, let me add that the Harvindar Singh episode was not entirely uncalled for...It did serve its purpose...Now whether he did that with purpose or without really realizing the cons... (Read: the jail sentence on his record and not-so-secured times ).

In a nutshell, what he did can't really be condemned for the fact that it did serve its purpose (Read: instilling a feeling in the political fraternity that "We would be the next target")...But again...Violence can be a double-edged sword and though an attractive proposition, cannot alone be a panacea for all evils...
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 legalbird 28 Feb 12, 03:16
aw, thanks. :) Glad to know there is someone who does read. ;)

But wrt your point about Harvinder Singh being justified- I really disagree. Though I can totally understand his frustration over the whole corruption issue and nothing being done about it, the measure he took to remedy the same can achieve nothing constructive. It's the same reason why I could not justify Naxalism- though I totally understand the reason of taking upto arms and how the our State only takes people seriously once they start resorting to violence, in the end, it's common people who suffer either side when State reacts to such violence via its seemingly prime goal to maintain "law and order" over constitutionalism. As educated and seemingly sane people, we cannot drop to the same tactics.
Reply Report to LI

refreshSort chronologically Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.

Latest comments