NUJS Kolkata professor Shamnad Basheer, who is the HRD ministry’s chair professor for intellectual property, argued over two days in his first-of-its-kind academic intervention in the landmark Novartis-Glivec patent hearing in the Supreme Court.

Swiss drug maker Novartis had approached the SC in September when it was refused a patent for cancer drug Glivec which is sold by India’s generic drug makers to reportedly 1.2 billion Indians and to poorer nations across the world.

Basheer argued before justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Desai that even though Novartis didn’t satisfy the test to patent Glivec, excessive pricing can also not be a ground to revoke a patent. [Spicy IP]

In August, pharma company Natco had filed for defamation against Basheer in the Delhi high court, claiming that its reputation was harmed by Basheer’s comments in his entry in SpicyIP on the company’s ongoing legal battle.

Experts & Views
Click to show 25 comments
at your own risk

NB: By reading the comments you agree that they are the personal views and opinions of readers, for which Legally India has no liability whatsoever. Because anonymous comments may be biased or unreliable, you agree that you will not allow any comment(s) to affect your estimation of any person(s) or organisation(s). If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to administrator' below the comment with your objection and we will review it as soon as practicable.


Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort comments chronologically

Like +5 No like -0 Diwakar 2012-11-20 10:40  interesting
Awesome - Well done!!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +5 No like -0 Dutta 2012-11-20 11:21  interesting
Way to go Sir. Hopefully this is the first of many.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +18 No like -1 Noojie 2012-11-20 14:00  interesting  top rated
It's great that Shamnad is doing what he is. But we all feel that he publicizes a bit much. Every little thing is circulated and mailed to people. Wish he focused his attention on teaching in class.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +9 No like -0 Noojie 2012-11-21 15:21  interesting
Dear Noojie,

Being a Noojie you should know he is a govt. appointed Chair Professor. The seat of the Chair is in NUJS. His obligations do not include teaching in class!

Fellow Noojie.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +1 No like -0 J low.. 2012-12-09 01:24
a first time intervention by a professor in leading case (if the news is correct) is very very worthy of publication. and we must take pride in this fact. this is no "little" thing. the only thing "little" is your petty jealous mind.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +11 No like -0 Cynic 2012-11-20 14:04  interesting
Why does this post say "successful"?? The case has not been decided yet and it is possible that his contentions will be rejected.
"I’m glad to report that the bench, consisting of Justice Alam & Justice Desai, gave Shamnad a patient and receptive hearing in his role": is getting a patient and receptive hearing success in a case?? Come on, Spicy IP. Lose the sycophancy.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +10 No like -0 Optimist 2012-11-21 15:25  interesting
Hey, it says the intervention was successful. Thats a fact! Most interventions are rejected by Courts.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +7 No like -1 Legally Young 2012-11-20 16:14  interesting
I agree with #3 and #4. Everything these guys do is exaggerated by SpicyIP. Don't know how these guys take time out of their real job for all this!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +9 No like -0 Stunned 2012-11-21 15:28  interesting
Ughh, seriously? What do you do young fellow?... except for being a critic.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +10 No like -0 ipenthu 2012-11-20 19:13  interesting
Prof Basheer is chaired professor. Aren't chairs supposed to engage more with research and policy? I believe he's on unpaid leave now from NUJS...and is doing all this cool stuff. High time we encouraged this..and not let jealousy get the better of us!!!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +10 No like -0 Optimist 2012-11-21 15:30  interesting
Absolutely. Im surprised. When the same happens in the western world, they are called the best academic in the world. When someone is trying to develop Indian law, he is met with criticism and jealousy. Shame.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +12 No like -0 Idle Worship 2012-11-21 07:57  interesting  top rated
Completely agree with Noojie and the others finally coming out to criticise Prof Basheer. Prof Basheer demands transparency from others. Would he please disclose how many class hours he took while at NUJS? Surely, if you hold a salaried faculty position you are expected to take classes? I think there are similarities between Prof Basheer and certain people in the Anna Hazare movement. What people have a problem with is his tendency to hog attention and use the media for every little thing he does. Just like there are many NGOs who fight against corruption without fanfare and media attention, there are other people working towards legal reforms quietly and in a dedicated manner. How often does LI focus on them compared to Prof Basheer? I also feel Lawrence Liang does not get due coverage from LI. Unlike Prof Basheer, he never drew a salary from a big law firm or the government and was always involved with activism in the true sense. How many times has LI highlighted the stellar work that ALF does?
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +11 No like -0 Not so idle 2012-11-21 14:06  interesting
Prof S Basheer holds a research chair. The focus of the chair is on research and policy; not on teaching. NUJS does not even pay his salary-it comes from MHRD and his main duty is to research and give policy advise the government. He still offers a course once a year-i've been a student and he is an incredible teacher..energetic, passionate and forcing us to think out of the box. I really wish he taught more.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +11 No like -0 NLSIU 2012-11-21 15:28  interesting
Why stop with Lawrence Liang and Shamnad Basheer? What about all the other pioneers who are from NLSIU - the Bar Exam people, the entire backroom bunch in the 377 case, all the top partners in all the law firms, all the dynamic young teachers in many of the colleges, and all the senior, not the senior counsel....but you get what I mean.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +6 No like -0 @Idle worship 2012-11-21 15:34  interesting
You worship idleness? Please grow up and dont talk without knowing fully what you are talking about.
How on earth can you compare Apples with Oranges?!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +6 No like -0 rockon 2012-11-21 09:30  interesting
Two things:
1. let us appreciate Shamnad's efforts. Trust me guys its very difficult to get non-technical guys understand this stuff. was in court hearing case of Mars and Swiss against UOI. It was hilarious, Petitioner's lawyer (a lady senior advocate known for creating huge hue and cry) was having difficulty in pronouncing the technical names and read the stuff and judges were yawning and opposite side layer s. ganesh was the only one who could understand anything at all. So Shamnad must have drilled something to all sides. Kudos!
2. Shamnad were u AC or intervener. If AC then court needed u and if intervener u were just harping about urself.
3. finally, i trust this guy wouldn't deviate from his basic job i.e
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +0 No like -0 S 2012-11-21 10:26
@ Rockon, you do put relevant points and hence I thought of actually putting a reply to you.
Shamnad was not an amicus, but an intervenor. This fact comes out if you download his 'submissions' file that are available on the SpicyIP site.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +9 No like -0 the J factor 2012-11-21 13:05  interesting
so did shamnad send this story to LI? or did LI take it from spicyip? it looks like the latter....and surely, if its true that this is the first such academic intervention in the SC, then its worth reporting no? why blame shamnad? if other legal pioneers need to be covered, so be it. but why cast aspersions on the good professor for going beyond the call of duty to contribute to legal development? Jealous colours us all sadly!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +3 No like -0 D 2012-11-22 06:16
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +1 No like -0 The Truth 2012-11-24 16:42
All you Shamnad fans, you don't get an MHRD Chair without the backing of an NLU. In Shamnad's case, MP Singh backed him even though he did not have a PhD. MP Singh allowed him to work on his PhD thesis while at NUJS. I feel Shamnad should have taken classes as a way to repay the favour. It is not that hard to teach undergrads and the students would have benefitted. Instead the task was entrusted to a far inferior teacher.
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +3 No like -0 better truth 2012-11-25 04:13
woo hoo!...the chairs are a favour to the NLU's..not the other way around! Why don't you go and look at how many chairs really function...will give some idea on why people like Basheer need to be appreciated!

I don't know the deal between Professor Singh and Basheer...but having some knowledge of the chairs, I can tell you that the main purpose is to increase research and policy..
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +2 No like -0 noojie 2012-11-25 04:19
[...] is not an inferior teacher! he is one of the best. So go get your facts right first!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +0 No like -0 @The Truth 2012-11-25 09:53
Better Truth is right. and here is the ultimate truth. you are simply an ignorant person, filled with jealousy and contempt. instead of wasting your time in here, just try and do something constructive.
Also even though he is not obligated to teach, he has taught once almost every year. So i dont know what trash you keep talking about.
and about PhD... first find out what it takes to be a Chair Professor. Then say something blabbermouth.
Even Justice Ruma Pal wasnt a PhD but the govt. appointed her as head of Human Rights Chair in NUJS. Are you saying that is also MP Singh's charisma?
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +3 No like -0 something missing 2012-11-25 05:01
Clearly, I'm missing something in all of this. Wasn't this article about a key development in the Indian legal space, namely an academic intervention in a high profile IP case for the first time. Should we not appreciate this development? This is the problem with our dear country. Never appreciate the good--always point to the bad. Whether Prof Basheer teaches or not depends on the terms of contract between him and his University. Research chairs are generally meant to focus on research. And if the Ministry of HRD is directly paying his salary and bearing all his expenses and that of the chair, then what claim does the University have on him? Is he not more answerable to the Ministry?
Reply | Report to LI | #  link
Like +3 No like -0 anonymous 2012-11-25 14:58
Friends: I am highly amused by all this tamasha. But let me first ask: why does LI encourage these gossipy trash comments? The matter is about an academic intervention which allegedly is the first and not about Shamnad's contract with NUJS. We need to celebrate this new legal development, unless we think all academics are potheads and should stay away from courts! I had a friend who was there on both days that Shamnad argued. I was told that while he was brilliant on day one, he was not so dazzling on day 2. The judge appeared to be impatient and was rushing him and even forcing him to comment on facts which he refused to do. Anyway, I just read his written submissions on SpicyIP and they are quite persuasive and well balanced. I'd love to see some comments on the merits or otherwise of these submissions by those who know the subject. Sadly, I have not seen any such commentary either here or on SpicyIP. Speaks volumes about the calibre of the audience that both these websites boast of!
Reply | Report to LI | #  link

refreshSort comments chronologically

Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.

Add comment

Comments locked on old articles.