Thursday, September09, 2010
[advertisement]

The must-read email

Free newsletter
By email every Friday,
putting Indian legal news into context.




Don't miss the story

Delhi HC arbitration centre kick-started; 3 cases already referred

Bar, Bench & Litigation


gavelThe Delhi High Court has already referred three cases to its brand-new arbitration centre for adjudication, which was started up only two weeks ago.

Kachwaha & Partners arbitration partner and general counsel of the core committee of the Delhi High Court arbitration center, Dharmendra Rautray, said: "The High Court has referred three cases to the center for arbitration but we're yet to receive request for arbitration from the parties.

"Further details relating to the case will only be known after the parties file request for arbitration with us."

The arbitration center was only inaugurated by the Chief Justice of India on 25 November 2009 to provide institutional arbitration under the framework and procedures laid down by a core committee constituted in this regard by the Delhi High Court Chief Justice A P Shah.

Rautray said that in the first case, ten days notice has been given to the parties to make the representations and the court has given 15 days to file a claim statement in the other two cases.

In one case, the matter will be filed before the center on 14 December 2009.

Rautray explained: "The current references have not been made under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) and all three cases referred had an explicit arbitration clause."

Legislative developments in the history of the Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism in India provided for insertion of Section 89 in the CPC through an amendment in 1999, which paved the way for the settlement of disputes outside the courts.

"Whenever an appointment of an arbitrator request is filed with the HC without naming individual or institutional arbitrator, the court will refer it to us [the arbitration center]," he added.

The arbitration center consists of a governing body, secretariat, core committee and panel of arbitrators. The core committee has one chief counsel, two general counsels and two other counsels.

Rautray said: "I am working as a pro bono general counsel, senior advocate A K Ganguly is the chief counsel of the committee, who also works pro bono. There is one more general counsel in the court committee who gets paid and her appointment was made on the recommendation of Delhi High Court judges. Our governing body has nine members."

In this institutional arbitration, the governing legislation remains the Arbitration and Conciliation Act while the procedural aspects are defined under the rules prescribed by the Delhi High Court for the arbitration centre.

Rautray explained that the arbitration centre would aim to resolve disputes quickly by hitting parties that unreasonably delay proceedings with costs. "Time tables are set for both arbitrators and the parties to comply with the recording of oral evidence, expert evidence and submissions. So everything is within a time period and in case it is not followed, the parties are put at cost."

Last month the London Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) set up an Indian chapter and earlier this year the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) launched in Delhi.

Comments (3)Add Comment
NB: The comments below are the personal views and opinions expressed by readers and are not those of Legally India. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please send us a message with your objection and contact details and we will review it as soon as practicable.
0
#1...
written by adstruct, 12 December 2009 02:12
I have faced arbitratral tribunal which was put against me without my concent as it was mentioned in contract. The company has made a very huge cheating with me. I was not aware with such arbitration laws so I had not appeared against arbitral tribunal. There was only communication by letters. I have demanded the documents against arbitral tribunal from the petioner company but the tribunal has not forced the petioner to provide the documents as the tribunal was setup by a company. When I had put my counterclaim with all documentary evidence which I had, then tribunal rejected my counter claim and passed the award against me. I had gone for appeal u/s 34 in Delhi High court, but judge said that why you had not appeared against tribunal? and only due to that reason hon'ble judge is not ready to admit my appeal and donot want to interfere in the award passed by arbitral tribunal. I had all documentry evidence against company inspite of that I am not getting justice, only due to the reason that I had not appeared against tribunal. I can prove that the petioner company is financial terror of the indian economy from my documentry evidences but I am helpless. From where and how I can get justice?
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#2...
written by Samar Kachwaha, 12 December 2009 05:52
If you would have sought adequate legal advise, you would have appeared before the tribunal, for that is always better. If you feel the tribunal does not have jurisdiction or that you never consented for arbitration, the appropriate forum to challenge the same is before the Tribunal itself, under Section 16 (2) of the Arbitration Act. Now, you are
riding on thin ice as you cannot raise the issue of jurisdiction u/s 34 as you never raised it u/s 16 (2). However, you can say that the tribunal did not take into consideration the documentary evidence supplied by you and / or did not furnish any reasons for not considering the same in its award and thus say that the tribunal misconducted itself. It would be tough and you need to seek proper legal guidance before continuing further.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#3Avijit Singh
written by Anonymous, 08 January 2010 21:17
ignorance of law is no excuse, but ignorance of pending dispute is,,,thereby meaning if you did not have the knowledge of the fact that such arbitration proceedings have been inittiated against you in the said tribunal , and you were further not given a ample oppurtunity to replresent yourself , also beacuse of the fact that the constituion and composition of arbitration tribunal was invalid and biased towards a certain party, than your matter will surely be appreciated and admitted if you go in appeal.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy

More Topics »

Most read...

  • Articles
  • Blogs
  • 48 hours
  • Tags